Product

Company

Resources

Book a demo

Book a demo

Inventory Valuation Methods: FIFO vs LIFO

Executive summary

Inventory valuation determines how businesses assign cost to goods sold and to the inventory that remains on the balance sheet. The method used influences profit reporting, tax liabilities, working capital levels and how efficiently capital is deployed across the business. The most widely used inventory valuation approaches are First-In, First-Out (FIFO), Last-In, First-Out (LIFO) and the Weighted Average Cost method. Each method determines which inventory costs are recognised when products are sold and which costs remain recorded as inventory. Because inventory is usually one of the largest current assets on a company’s balance sheet, valuation choices affect financial statements and operational metrics such as gross margin, working capital and return on capital employed. Finance leaders therefore, need to understand not only how these methods work, but also how they influence financial performance, reporting transparency and capital efficiency. This guide explains the main inventory valuation methods, how they affect financial statements and how businesses can choose an approach that aligns with their operating model and financial objectives.

For many finance leaders, inventory valuation first becomes noticeable when reviewing margins. A month-end report shows an improvement in gross profit even though supplier prices have increased. The numbers appear positive, but the explanation lies not in pricing or operational efficiency, but in how inventory costs are recorded.

Inventory purchased at different times rarely costs the same amount. Freight charges fluctuate, supplier prices change and inflation shifts the cost base over time. When those goods are eventually sold, accounting rules require companies to determine which of those historical costs should be recognised as the cost of goods sold and which should remain recorded as inventory.

The method used to make that decision is known as the inventory valuation method. Although it may appear to be a technical accounting detail, it has real financial consequences. It affects reported profit, the value of inventory on the balance sheet, working capital levels and how efficiently capital is deployed across the business. For finance teams responsible for managing margins and capital efficiency, understanding these methods is therefore essential.

What are inventory valuation methods?

Inventory valuation methods are accounting approaches used to determine two key financial figures. The first is the cost of goods sold (COGS) recorded in the income statement during a reporting period. The second is the value of inventory remaining at the end of that period.

Businesses rarely purchase inventory at a single fixed price. Supplier costs change over time due to inflation, freight charges, exchange rate fluctuations or changes in raw material prices. As a result, inventory purchased at different times may carry different costs.

When products are sold, accounting standards require companies to determine which purchase costs should be recognised in the cost of goods sold and which costs should remain recorded as inventory.

The chosen valuation method determines how those costs are allocated.

How inventory valuation affects financial statements

Inventory valuation influences both major financial statements.

On the income statement, the valuation method determines the cost of goods sold. Since gross profit is calculated by subtracting COGS from revenue, different valuation methods can produce different profit levels.

On the balance sheet, the remaining inventory is recorded as a current asset. The valuation method therefore affects the total value of assets reported and, consequently, working capital and capital employed.

Accounting frameworks such as IFRS and GAAP require companies to apply their chosen method consistently so that financial results remain comparable across reporting periods.

FIFO (First-In, First-Out)

FIFO assumes that the earliest inventory purchased is sold first. From an accounting perspective, this means that the oldest purchase costs are recognised in the cost of goods sold while the most recent purchases remain recorded as inventory.

This assumption often aligns with the physical flow of goods in many industries. Businesses that sell perishable or fast-moving products typically dispatch older inventory first in order to reduce waste or obsolescence.

Example of FIFO

Consider a company that purchases inventory in two batches.

Purchase batch

Units

Cost per unit

Batch 1

100

£10

Batch 2

100

£15

If the company sells 100 units, FIFO assumes that the items from the first batch were sold first.

The cost of goods sold therefore reflects the earlier purchase price:

COGS = 100 × £10 = £1,000

The remaining inventory consists of the newer units purchased at £15 each.

Financial impact of FIFO

The financial impact of FIFO becomes particularly noticeable during periods when supplier prices are increasing. Because older and cheaper inventory costs are recognised first, the cost recorded against sales is lower than the cost that would be recognised under other methods.

Lower recorded costs result in higher gross profit, which then flows through the income statement and increases operating profit and net income. At the same time, the inventory remaining on the balance sheet reflects more recent purchase prices, which are typically higher in inflationary conditions. This increases the value of inventory recorded as a current asset.

Higher profit also means higher taxable income. As a result, companies using FIFO may report stronger profitability but face higher tax liabilities during periods of rising costs.

When FIFO works well

FIFO is widely used because the accounting assumption closely reflects the physical movement of inventory in many businesses. It tends to work particularly well in the following situations:

  1. Perishable or time-sensitive goods
    Industries such as food production, pharmaceuticals and cosmetics usually sell older inventory first to avoid expiration or spoilage.


  2. Fast-moving consumer products
    Retailers and consumer goods manufacturers often replenish inventory quickly, meaning earlier purchases are naturally sold before newer stock.


  3. Companies reporting under IFRS
    Since LIFO is not permitted under IFRS, FIFO becomes one of the most widely adopted methods for international financial reporting.


  4. Businesses seeking balance sheet transparency
    Because newer inventory remains recorded on the balance sheet, FIFO usually reflects inventory values that are closer to current replacement costs.

For these reasons, FIFO is the most common inventory valuation method used globally.

LIFO (Last-In, First-Out)

LIFO works in the opposite way to FIFO. Instead of assuming that the oldest inventory is sold first, the method assumes that the most recently purchased items are sold first.

This means the newest purchase costs are recorded in the cost of goods sold, while older inventory remains recorded on the balance sheet.

Example of LIFO

Using the same purchase example:

Purchase batch

Units

Cost per unit

Batch 1

100

£10

Batch 2

100

£15

If the company sells 100 units, LIFO assumes the newer batch was sold first.

COGS = 100 × £15 = £1,500

The remaining inventory consists of the older units valued at £10 each.

Financial impact of LIFO

The main financial advantage of LIFO becomes apparent during periods of rising costs. Because the newest and most expensive inventory costs are recognised first, the cost of goods sold becomes higher than it would be under FIFO.

Higher costs reduce gross profit and net income, which lowers taxable income and can reduce corporate tax payments. This tax benefit is the primary reason some companies adopt LIFO.

However, because older and cheaper costs remain in inventory, the balance sheet may show inventory values that are significantly lower than current replacement costs. This can distort financial ratios and reduce the reported value of assets.

Limitations of LIFO

Although LIFO offers tax advantages in some situations, it also introduces several practical and reporting challenges.

  • LIFO is not permitted under IFRS, meaning companies that report internationally cannot use it.

  • Inventory values recorded on the balance sheet may become outdated because older costs remain in inventory.

  • Financial ratios may appear weaker due to lower asset values.

  • Comparisons between companies become more difficult when different valuation methods are used.

  • Maintaining historical cost layers can increase accounting complexity.

For these reasons, LIFO is primarily used by companies reporting under U.S. GAAP rather than internationally.

Weighted Average Cost method

The weighted average method assigns a single average cost to all inventory units. Instead of tracking individual purchase batches, the method combines the cost of all inventory purchases and calculates an average unit cost.

That average cost is then applied to both the cost of goods sold and the inventory remaining at the end of the reporting period.

Example

Purchase

Units

Cost per unit

Total cost

Batch 1

100

£10

£1,000

Batch 2

100

£15

£1,500

Total

200


£2,500

Average cost per unit:

£2,500 ÷ 200 = £12.50

If the company sells 100 units, the cost of goods sold becomes:

100 × £12.50 = £1,250

The remaining inventory is valued using the same average cost.

Advantages of the weighted average method

The weighted average method simplifies inventory accounting while producing stable financial results. Its main advantages include:

  • It reduces the impact of price volatility by smoothing the effect of changing purchase prices.

  • Accounting becomes simpler because businesses do not need to track multiple inventory cost layers.

  • The method works well in industries that manage large volumes of identical products, such as chemicals, commodities and raw materials.

  • Profit margins tend to fluctuate less than under FIFO or LIFO, which can make financial analysis easier.

Other specialised inventory approaches

Some industries use specialised inventory management approaches that prioritise operational needs such as quality control or tax optimisation.

FEFO (First Expired, First Out)

FEFO prioritises selling inventory that will expire soonest, regardless of when it was purchased. This approach is common in industries such as pharmaceuticals, food production and medical supplies where product shelf life is critical.

HIFO (Highest In, First Out)

HIFO records the highest-cost inventory first in the cost of goods sold. By recognising higher costs earlier, this approach can reduce taxable income. However, it is rarely used in formal accounting because of its complexity and limited support under accounting standards.

Specific identification

Specific identification tracks the exact cost of each individual item sold. This method is suitable for businesses selling unique or high-value items such as vehicles, luxury goods or specialised machinery.

How inventory valuation affects working capital

Working capital measures the funds available to support daily operations. It is calculated as:

Working capital = Current assets − Current liabilities

Inventory forms a significant portion of current assets in many businesses. When inventory values increase, working capital also increases because more capital is tied up in stock.

While higher working capital can strengthen liquidity ratios, it also means more funds are locked into inventory rather than being available for other uses such as investment or debt repayment.

Finance teams therefore monitor inventory turnover and stock levels closely in order to ensure that capital is being used efficiently.

Inventory valuation and capital employed

Capital employed represents the total capital invested in a business to generate profit. It is typically calculated as:

Capital employed = Total assets − Current liabilities

Because inventory is included within total assets, the valuation method directly influences capital employed.

Higher inventory values increase the amount of capital invested in the business. If profits do not increase proportionally, return on capital employed may decline. For this reason, efficient inventory management is closely linked to overall capital efficiency.

Choosing the right inventory valuation method

There is no universal inventory valuation method that suits every business. The most appropriate choice depends on operational processes, financial objectives and regulatory requirements.

Finance teams typically evaluate several factors when selecting a method.

Decision factor

Why it matters

Cost trends

Inflation or deflation changes financial outcomes

Industry practices

Certain sectors favour particular methods

Tax strategy

Some methods reduce taxable income

Accounting standards

IFRS restricts the use of LIFO

Investor expectations

Balance sheet transparency matters

Many companies model different scenarios using multiple valuation methods to understand how each approach affects profitability, tax obligations and capital efficiency.

Optimising inventory management

Inventory valuation is only one part of managing inventory effectively. Operational processes determine how efficiently inventory supports revenue generation and capital management.

Several practices help businesses optimise inventory performance.

Real-time inventory visibility improves accuracy and reduces accounting errors. Monitoring inventory turnover allows finance teams to identify slow-moving stock and reduce holding costs. Setting appropriate reorder points helps prevent both stockouts and excess inventory. Financial modelling enables businesses to understand how changes in costs or demand may affect profitability and working capital.

When finance and operations teams work closely together, inventory decisions can support both operational efficiency and capital allocation.

Ready to automate your collections with AI agents?

Book a demo

FAQs

What is AI in accounts receivable?

What are the main use cases for AI in accounts receivable?

How do you implement AI in accounts receivable?

How does AI reduce DSO?

Can AI handle customer billing queries, or only send reminders?

Rasmus Areskoug

Share

Mar 9, 2026

Subscribe to the Paraglide blog

Get notified about new product features, customer updates, and more.

By submitting this form, you agree to receive emails for our products and services per our Privacy Policy. You can unsubscribe anytime.

Related posts

How to Calculate Collection Rate in Accounts Receivable

Collection rate measures how effectively a company converts invoices into cash during a defined period. For finance teams, it provides a direct view of how well collections are performing and whether overdue receivables are likely to increase. Unlike metrics such as Days Sales Outstanding (DSO), which measure the average time it takes to collect payments, collection rate focuses on the proportion of invoices that are actually recovered. When tracked consistently, it helps finance teams identify early signals of payment delays, disputes or weakening credit control. This guide explains how to calculate collection rate using the most common formulas, how to interpret the result in a real accounts receivable workflow and which reporting mistakes frequently distort the metric.

Mar 12, 2026

What Is Remittance Parsing? How to Automate Remittance Advice Processing

Remittance advice handling is one of the most overlooked bottlenecks in accounts receivable operations. Finance teams often receive payment allocation information through a mixture of emails, attachments and portal messages, which means analysts must manually interpret how each payment should be applied before cash application can take place. When this process is slow or inconsistent, it delays payment allocation, increases unapplied cash and creates unnecessary work for collections teams that may end up chasing invoices that customers have already settled. Improving remittance parsing therefore, has a direct impact on cash application speed, receivables visibility and overall Order to Cash efficiency. As payment volumes increase and remittance formats remain inconsistent, many organisations are moving toward automated approaches that capture remittance advice from finance inboxes, extract payment allocation details and validate them against open invoices. Modern solutions increasingly use AI agents to interpret payment intent, manage unstructured remittance messages and reduce the manual effort required to process incoming payments.

Mar 11, 2026

Deduction Process in Order to Cash (O2C): A Practical Guide for Finance Leaders

Deductions are one of the most persistent operational challenges in the Order to Cash (O2C) process. When customers pay less than the invoiced amount, finance teams must determine whether the deduction is legitimate, investigate supporting evidence and either recover the remaining balance or approve the claim. For many organisations, this process remains highly manual. Deductions arrive through shared finance inboxes, customer portals, remittance files or ERP exceptions, and Accounts Receivable teams often spend significant time sorting emails, gathering documents and coordinating with internal teams before a case can be resolved. As deduction volumes increase, the impact becomes visible in delayed cash collection, higher Days Sales Outstanding (DSO) and increased operational workload across finance and shared services teams. A structured deduction process improves visibility, reduces investigation time and prevents revenue leakage. Increasingly, finance organisations are introducing automation and AI agents to handle the repetitive administrative work involved in deduction management while enabling AR teams to focus on investigation and resolution. This guide explains how deductions arise in the O2C process, how the deduction workflow operates in practice, the most common deduction categories, the metrics finance leaders should track and how automation can improve deduction resolution and working capital performance.

Mar 10, 2026

Finally, a collections system that runs itself.

Book a demo

Finally, a collections system that runs itself.

Book a demo

Product

Product overview

Billing support agent

Collection agent

Company

About

Careers

Contact us

Resources

Blog

Agents for accounts receivable

Agents for credit management

Agents for debt collection

Agents for order-to-cash

Agents for shared services

Agents for dunning

Legal

Privacy policy

Security & data protection

Terms & conditions

Copyright 2026 Paraglide AI

Product

Product overview

Billing support agent

Collection agent

Company

About

Careers

Contact us

Resources

Blog

Agents for accounts receivable

Agents for credit management

Agents for debt collection

Agents for order-to-cash

Agents for shared services

Agents for dunning

Legal

Privacy policy

Security & data protection

Terms & conditions

Copyright 2026 Paraglide AI